Sevenfold reasoning of the chariot: Difference between revisions

From Rigpa Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Sevenfold reasoning of the chariot''' ([[Wyl.]] ''shing rta rnam bdun gyi rigs pa'') - a line of logical reasoning used by [[Chandrakirti]] in his [[Madhyamakavatara]] in order to establish the [[selflessness of the individual]] and show that the self is merely a designation, applied to an assembly of parts, in just the same way that the designation 'chariot' is applied to the assembly of its parts, i.e., the wheels, axle, body and so on.
'''Sevenfold reasoning of the chariot''' (Tib. ཤིང་རྟ་རྣམ་བདུན་གྱི་རིགས་པ་, ''shingta nam dün gyi rikpa'', [[Wyl.]] ''shing rta rnam bdun gyi rigs pa'') a line of logical reasoning used by [[Chandrakirti]] in his [[Madhyamakavatara]] in order to establish the [[selflessness of the individual]] and show that the self is merely a designation, applied to an assembly of parts, in just the same way that the designation 'chariot' is applied to the assembly of its parts, i.e., the wheels, axle, body and so on.


#There is no chariot which is other than its parts
#There is no chariot which is other than its parts
Line 9: Line 9:
#There is no chariot which is the shape of its parts
#There is no chariot which is the shape of its parts


==Further Reading==
* [[Tsongkhapa Lobzang Drakpa]], ''[[Lamrim Chenmo|The Great Treatise On The Stages Of The Path To Enlightenment]]'', Vol. 3, Chapter 22. Snow Lion, ISBN 1-55939-166-9
[[Category:Philosophical Tenets]]
[[Category:Enumerations]]
[[Category:Enumerations]]
[[Category:Philosophical Tenets]]
[[Category:07-Seven]]

Latest revision as of 05:17, 30 May 2018

Sevenfold reasoning of the chariot (Tib. ཤིང་རྟ་རྣམ་བདུན་གྱི་རིགས་པ་, shingta nam dün gyi rikpa, Wyl. shing rta rnam bdun gyi rigs pa) — a line of logical reasoning used by Chandrakirti in his Madhyamakavatara in order to establish the selflessness of the individual and show that the self is merely a designation, applied to an assembly of parts, in just the same way that the designation 'chariot' is applied to the assembly of its parts, i.e., the wheels, axle, body and so on.

  1. There is no chariot which is other than its parts
  2. There is no chariot which is the same as its parts
  3. There is no chariot which possesses its parts
  4. There is no chariot which depends on its parts
  5. There is no chariot upon which the parts depend
  6. There is no chariot which is the collection of its parts
  7. There is no chariot which is the shape of its parts

Further Reading