Difference between revisions of "Imputed nature"

From Rigpa Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Imputed nature'''―Imputed or imaginery (Skt. Parikalpita; Tib. ཀུན་བརྟགས་, [[Wyl.]] ''kun btags'') in this sense does not mean to be hallucinatory as opposed to being real—it is to be constructed as an object by the operation of the mind.<ref>From an article by Jay L. Garfield on [[Vasubandhu]]’s ''[[Treatise on the Three Natures]]'' in ''Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings'', Oxford University Press 2009, ISBN: 978-0-19-532817-2</ref>
+
'''Imputed nature'''― imputed or imaginary (Skt. Parikalpita; Tib. [[ཀུན་བརྟགས་]], [[Wyl.]] ''kun btags'') in this sense does not mean to be hallucinatory as opposed to being real—it is to be constructed as an object by the operation of the mind.<ref>From an article by Jay L. Garfield on [[Vasubandhu]]’s ''[[Treatise on the Three Natures]]'' in ''Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings'', Oxford University Press 2009, ISBN: 978-0-19-532817-2</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
==Internal Links==
 
==Internal Links==
*[[Treatise on the Three Natures]]
+
*[[Three Natures]]
*[[Dependent nature]]
 
*[[Truly existent nature]]
 
  
 
[[Category:Philosophical Tenets]]
 
[[Category:Philosophical Tenets]]
 
[[Category:Three Essential Natures]]
 
[[Category:Three Essential Natures]]
 
[[Category:Chittamatra]]
 
[[Category:Chittamatra]]

Revision as of 15:24, 19 December 2015

Imputed nature― imputed or imaginary (Skt. Parikalpita; Tib. ཀུན་བརྟགས་, Wyl. kun btags) in this sense does not mean to be hallucinatory as opposed to being real—it is to be constructed as an object by the operation of the mind.[1]

References

  1. From an article by Jay L. Garfield on Vasubandhu’s Treatise on the Three Natures in Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings, Oxford University Press 2009, ISBN: 978-0-19-532817-2

Internal Links