Imputed nature: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "'''Imputed nature'''―Imputed or imaginery (Skt. Parikalpita; Tib. ཀུན་བརྟགས་, Wyl. ''kun btags'') in this sense does not mean to be hallucinatory as...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Imputed nature'''―Imputed or imaginery (Skt. Parikalpita; Tib. ཀུན་བརྟགས་, [[Wyl.]] ''kun btags'') in this sense does not mean to be hallucinatory as opposed to being real—it is to be constructed as an object by the operation of the mind.<ref>From an article by Jay L. Garfield | '''Imputed nature'''―Imputed or imaginery (Skt. Parikalpita; Tib. ཀུན་བརྟགས་, [[Wyl.]] ''kun btags'') in this sense does not mean to be hallucinatory as opposed to being real—it is to be constructed as an object by the operation of the mind.<ref>From an article by Jay L. Garfield on [[Vasubandhu]]’s ''[[Treatise on the Three Natures]]'' in ''Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings'', Oxford University Press 2009, ISBN: 978-0-19-532817-2</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 15:00, 18 December 2015
Imputed nature―Imputed or imaginery (Skt. Parikalpita; Tib. ཀུན་བརྟགས་, Wyl. kun btags) in this sense does not mean to be hallucinatory as opposed to being real—it is to be constructed as an object by the operation of the mind.[1]
References
- ↑ From an article by Jay L. Garfield on Vasubandhu’s Treatise on the Three Natures in Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings, Oxford University Press 2009, ISBN: 978-0-19-532817-2