Three types of investigation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (New page: The three types of investigation refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyi...) |
m (Could be either way, but to make Tib and Wyl. consistent) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The three types of investigation refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition'', p.221n55</ref> | The '''three types of investigation''' (Tib. དཔྱད་གསུམ་, [[Wyl.]] ''dpyad gsum'') refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition'', p.221n55</ref>. | ||
# the demonstration of what is evident (''mngon gyur'') is not invalidated by direct perception (''mngon sum''), | # the demonstration of what is evident (''mngon gyur'') is not invalidated by [[direct perception]] (''mngon sum''), | ||
# the demonstration of what is hidden (''lkog gyur'') is not invalidated by inference (''rjes dpag''), | # the demonstration of what is hidden (''lkog gyur'') is not invalidated by [[inference]] (''rjes dpag''), | ||
# the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (''shin tu lkog gyur'') is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements. | # the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (''shin tu lkog gyur'') is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.<ref>The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of ''scriptural authority''. See '''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.393, n115.</ref> | ||
from '''[[Mipham Rinpoche]]''', ''[[Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha]]''<ref>'''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<small> | |||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
</small> | |||
[[Category: Enumerations]] | |||
[[Category:03-Three]] |
Latest revision as of 19:46, 30 January 2021
The three types of investigation (Tib. དཔྱད་གསུམ་, Wyl. dpyad gsum) refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture[1].
- the demonstration of what is evident (mngon gyur) is not invalidated by direct perception (mngon sum),
- the demonstration of what is hidden (lkog gyur) is not invalidated by inference (rjes dpag),
- the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (shin tu lkog gyur) is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.[2]
from Mipham Rinpoche, Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha[3]
References
- ↑ Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition, p.221n55
- ↑ The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of scriptural authority. See Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.393, n115.
- ↑ Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."