Three types of investigation: Difference between revisions

From Rigpa Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (New page: The three types of investigation refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyi...)
 
m (Could be either way, but to make Tib and Wyl. consistent)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The three types of investigation refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition'', p.221n55</ref>
The '''three types of investigation''' (Tib. དཔྱད་གསུམ་, [[Wyl.]] ''dpyad gsum'') refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture<ref>Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, ''Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition'', p.221n55</ref>.
# the demonstration of what is evident (''mngon gyur'') is not invalidated by direct perception (''mngon sum''),
# the demonstration of what is evident (''mngon gyur'') is not invalidated by [[direct perception]] (''mngon sum''),
# the demonstration of what is hidden (''lkog gyur'') is not invalidated by inference (''rjes dpag''),
# the demonstration of what is hidden (''lkog gyur'') is not invalidated by [[inference]] (''rjes dpag''),
# the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (''shin tu lkog gyur'') is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.
# the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (''shin tu lkog gyur'') is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.<ref>The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of ''scriptural authority''. See '''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.393, n115.</ref>
 
from '''[[Mipham Rinpoche]]''', ''[[Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha]]''<ref>'''Mipham Rinpoche:''' ''The Adornment of the Middle Way'', p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."</ref>


from '''Mipham Rinpoche''', ''Words That Delight'', 347.
==References==
==References==
<small>
<references/>
<references/>
</small>
[[Category: Enumerations]]
[[Category:03-Three]]

Latest revision as of 19:46, 30 January 2021

The three types of investigation (Tib. དཔྱད་གསུམ་, Wyl. dpyad gsum) refer to the process of determining the validity of a scripture[1].

  1. the demonstration of what is evident (mngon gyur) is not invalidated by direct perception (mngon sum),
  2. the demonstration of what is hidden (lkog gyur) is not invalidated by inference (rjes dpag),
  3. the demonstration of what is extremely hidden (shin tu lkog gyur) is not contradicted (internally) by previous or later statements.[2]

from Mipham Rinpoche, Words to Delight My Teacher Manjughosha[3]

References

  1. Translation from: Douglas S. Duckworth, Mipam on Buddha-Nature, The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition, p.221n55
  2. The third point is sometimes abbreviated as the criteria of scriptural authority. See Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.393, n115.
  3. Mipham Rinpoche: The Adornment of the Middle Way, p.375: "But here we have the perfect teachings of the Tathagata, excellent in their beginning, middle, and end. These are like gold that is smelted, cut, and polished; they can withstand threefold examination and are not faulted by perception, inference, or verbal inconsistency."