Talk:Mahavyutpatti: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just an editorial question here, do we really routinely need to put the phonetics on every page? I can image there is a good use for that for words like bodhicitta (sem-kye) or so, but what ordinary person would need to know ''jedrak tu tokpar jepa''? For me it just makes the page look more messy. Your opinions please --[[User:Hankop|Hankop]] ([[User talk:Hankop|talk]]) 14:06, 6 April 2018 (CEST) | Just an editorial question here, do we really routinely need to put the phonetics on every page? I can image there is a good use for that for words like bodhicitta (sem-kye) or so, but what ordinary person would need to know ''jedrak tu tokpar jepa''? For me it just makes the page look more messy. Your opinions please --[[User:Hankop|Hankop]] ([[User talk:Hankop|talk]]) 14:06, 6 April 2018 (CEST) | ||
:No, not on pages such as this. You are right. --[[User:Adam|adam]] ([[User talk:Adam|talk]]) 14:47, 6 April 2018 (CEST) | :No, not on pages such as this. You are right. --[[User:Adam|adam]] ([[User talk:Adam|talk]]) 14:47, 6 April 2018 (CEST) | ||
It would be good to have consistency across all pages instead of arbitrary rules. [[User:Kent|Kent]] ([[User talk:Kent|talk]]) 19:26, 6 April 2018 (CEST) |
Revision as of 17:26, 6 April 2018
Just an editorial question here, do we really routinely need to put the phonetics on every page? I can image there is a good use for that for words like bodhicitta (sem-kye) or so, but what ordinary person would need to know jedrak tu tokpar jepa? For me it just makes the page look more messy. Your opinions please --Hankop (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2018 (CEST)
It would be good to have consistency across all pages instead of arbitrary rules. Kent (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2018 (CEST)