Talk:Mahavyutpatti: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It would be good to have consistency across all pages instead of arbitrary rules. [[User:Kent|Kent]] ([[User talk:Kent|talk]]) 19:26, 6 April 2018 (CEST) | It would be good to have consistency across all pages instead of arbitrary rules. [[User:Kent|Kent]] ([[User talk:Kent|talk]]) 19:26, 6 April 2018 (CEST) | ||
The other point is that you never know if a page inspires someone to learn Tibetan by looking at the phonetics and the letters. [[User:Kent|Kent]] ([[User talk:Kent|talk]]) 19:27, 6 April 2018 (CEST) |
Revision as of 17:27, 6 April 2018
Just an editorial question here, do we really routinely need to put the phonetics on every page? I can image there is a good use for that for words like bodhicitta (sem-kye) or so, but what ordinary person would need to know jedrak tu tokpar jepa? For me it just makes the page look more messy. Your opinions please --Hankop (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2018 (CEST)
It would be good to have consistency across all pages instead of arbitrary rules. Kent (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2018 (CEST)
The other point is that you never know if a page inspires someone to learn Tibetan by looking at the phonetics and the letters. Kent (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2018 (CEST)