Difference between revisions of "Talk:Two-Volume Lexicon"

From Rigpa Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
:Yes, Han. The original statement was simply adapted from the ''Tshig mdzod chen mo'', but it would be good if you could create a section called perhaps "Origins" and discuss this in more detail with references to traditional sources and modern scholarship...
 
:Yes, Han. The original statement was simply adapted from the ''Tshig mdzod chen mo'', but it would be good if you could create a section called perhaps "Origins" and discuss this in more detail with references to traditional sources and modern scholarship...
 
:--[[User:Adam|adam]] ([[User talk:Adam|talk]]) 16:09, 5 April 2018 (CEST)
 
:--[[User:Adam|adam]] ([[User talk:Adam|talk]]) 16:09, 5 April 2018 (CEST)
 +
 +
Okay, but I will first need to do more research. Any idea why the tshig mdzod chen mo is wrong here? Is it a well-known mistake in the tradition ?

Revision as of 08:15, 6 April 2018

Adam, kapstein writes in The Tibetan Assimilation of Buddhism: Conversion, Contestation, and Memory, page 229, note 31: However, by the early ninth century, when the emperor Khri Lde-srong-btsan issued his preface to the Sgra-sbyor-bam-gnyis (Simonsson 1957; Ishikawa 1990),

Thus, it seems scholars agree it was not during the time of Ralpachen but Senalek who wrote the preface.

Yes, Han. The original statement was simply adapted from the Tshig mdzod chen mo, but it would be good if you could create a section called perhaps "Origins" and discuss this in more detail with references to traditional sources and modern scholarship...
--adam (talk) 16:09, 5 April 2018 (CEST)

Okay, but I will first need to do more research. Any idea why the tshig mdzod chen mo is wrong here? Is it a well-known mistake in the tradition ?