Evidence: Difference between revisions

From Rigpa Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Evidence''' (Skt. ''liṅga''; Tib. [[རྟགས་]]; ''rtags'') in [[pramana]] is defined as "something which enables us to know something else". For example, in the well-known logical argument, the presence of smoke rising over the mountain pass can be the evidence enabling us to know that there is fire behind the mountain.
'''Evidence''' (Skt. ''liṅga''; Tib. [[རྟགས་]], ''tak'', [[Wyl.]] ''rtags'') in [[pramana]] is defined as "something which enables us to know something else".<ref>Note that the technical definition is often given as "[whatever] is arranged as evidence" (Wyl. ''rtags su bkod pa rtags kyi mtshan nyid'')</ref> For example, in the well-known logical argument, the presence of smoke rising over the mountain pass can be the evidence enabling us to know that there is fire behind the mountain.


==Subdivisions==
==Subdivisions==
Evidence<ref>These are also the three types of reason (''gtan tshigs'')</ref> is divided into three types:
Evidence is divided, first of all, into
#Non-observation (''mi dmigs pa'')
#correct evidence (Tib. [[རྟགས་ཡང་དག་]], Wyl. ''rtags yang dag'') in which the [[three modes]] are complete, and
#Nature (''rang bzhin'')
#incorrect evidence (Tib. [[ལྟར་སྣང་]], Wyl. ''ltar snang'')
#Effect(''<nowiki>'</nowiki>bras bu'')
 
Authentic evidence<ref>These are also the three types of reason ([[གཏན་ཚིགས་]], Wyl. ''gtan tshigs'')</ref> is divided into three types:
#Non-observation (Tib. [[མི་དམིགས་པ་]], Wyl. ''mi dmigs pa'')
#Nature (Tib [[རང་བཞིན་]], Wyl. ''rang bzhin'')
#Effect (Tib [[འབྲས་བུ་]], Wyl. ''<nowiki>'</nowiki>bras bu'')


==Alternative Translations==
==Alternative Translations==
Line 12: Line 16:
==Notes==
==Notes==
<small><references/></small>
<small><references/></small>


[[Category:Pramana]]
[[Category:Pramana]]

Latest revision as of 06:27, 3 May 2018

Evidence (Skt. liṅga; Tib. རྟགས་, tak, Wyl. rtags) in pramana is defined as "something which enables us to know something else".[1] For example, in the well-known logical argument, the presence of smoke rising over the mountain pass can be the evidence enabling us to know that there is fire behind the mountain.

Subdivisions

Evidence is divided, first of all, into

  1. correct evidence (Tib. རྟགས་ཡང་དག་, Wyl. rtags yang dag) in which the three modes are complete, and
  2. incorrect evidence (Tib. ལྟར་སྣང་, Wyl. ltar snang)

Authentic evidence[2] is divided into three types:

  1. Non-observation (Tib. མི་དམིགས་པ་, Wyl. mi dmigs pa)
  2. Nature (Tib རང་བཞིན་, Wyl. rang bzhin)
  3. Effect (Tib འབྲས་བུ་, Wyl. 'bras bu)

Alternative Translations

  • Logical reason (Tillemans)

Notes

  1. Note that the technical definition is often given as "[whatever] is arranged as evidence" (Wyl. rtags su bkod pa rtags kyi mtshan nyid)
  2. These are also the three types of reason (གཏན་ཚིགས་, Wyl. gtan tshigs)